Gavaskar Slams Ball-Tracking After Root’s Controversial Reprieve

Cricket legend Sunil Gavaskar didn’t hold back his criticism of ball-tracking technology following a contentious umpire’s call that granted England’s Joe Root a lifeline during a recent India vs. England match. The incident ignited a fresh debate on the effectiveness and accuracy of the technology used in the Decision Review System (DRS).

Root Survives Close LBW Call

The controversy arose when Root was struck on the pads, prompting a passionate LBW appeal from the Indian team. The on-field umpire ruled not out, and India opted for a review. Despite the ball-tracking projections seemingly showing the ball clipping the bails, the ‘umpire’s call’ verdict remained, much to the dismay of Gavaskar and many Indian fans.

Gavaskar Voices Concerns Over Technology’s Reliability

Gavaskar, commentating on the match, expressed his frustration with the decision and questioned the reliability of the ball-tracking technology. He argued that if the technology indicates the ball hitting the stumps, even marginally, the decision should be overturned regardless of the on-field umpire’s initial call. This incident has reignited discussions about the role and limitations of technology in cricket umpiring decisions.